![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:04 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Jaaaaags of yore had definite owner archetypes- eccentric wealthies and stuffy professorial types with so many books in their home that you have to wonder if maybe they’re not load bearing. Jaguar has since reinvented itself, but who for?
A typical XJ6 owner.
All other modern luxury brands have very well defined buyer bases:
Rolls Royce: Old money
Bentley: Athletes, New money
Mercedes: Daddy/Hubby’s money
BMW: Serious businessmen
Audi: Younger businessmen
Lexus: Wealthy Divorcées
Infiniti: Yuppies, Bros with money
Acura: People who don’t know better
Cadillac: Old people who wanna look young
I however, have never caught glimpse of someone driving a new XJ or XE.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:08 |
|
I see loads of XJ’s. Of course, not nearly as many as I do S-classes, 7's, and A8, but the XJ(l) is a favorite of super old guys who just associate the Jag brand with luxury.
Edit: as for the XE, that’s a great question. I don’t see nearly as many of those. Just did a quick google and apparently they MSRP at 34,000?? That’s about half as much as I’d have expected. I guess they’re just trying to diversify their market/don’t really care about brand dilution? This is weird.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:11 |
|
I obviously don’t own a Jag because I can’t afford one, but even if I could, I’m not a fan of the new grille, so I’d go for XK regardless. Seems petty, but at that price point, why buy something you don’t like the look of?
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:17 |
|
A partner at the accounting firm I work at just bought a new XF. She’s only late 40s, maybe 50.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:21 |
|
You’re spot on except for BMW: Serious businessmen AND high school girls.
Jag has re-branded itself to be the “edgy” sport/luxury brand. Just look at their commercials- they are basically exhaust note clips. So I’d say that Jaguar = mid-level hedge fund & finance guys.
Their re-branding has worked with the F-Type, but that’s only because the F-Type looks dope.
I see a lot of Ford-era Jags around. That’s because the average older XJ or XK costs about $10k-$15l. It’s a cheap status symbol considering how expensive the cars were when new. I’d bet Jags have the worst depreciation value out of all luxury brands.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:27 |
|
Come to Austin and you’ll see a few. Wealthy middle age who want something a little different or want to stand out a little.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:28 |
|
A quick look at my nearest jag dealer’s site says that I can get a 2013 XJ for near-as-makes-no-difference half the price of a new one:
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:31 |
|
If my books are load bearing, why does my floor creak when I walk by my dangerously overloaded bookcases?
I see tons of XFs and XJs. Maybe it’s a regional thing. I imagine that the target demo is still the same as it’s always been: someone who wants a powerful luxury car that’s different because it isn’t German.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:32 |
|
in my experience, jag owners are a mix of old money and business owners
![]() 06/24/2016 at 16:58 |
|
Volvo: boring people and weird people. But mostly boring people.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 17:06 |
|
Well educated people.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 17:07 |
|
*well educated soccer moms
![]() 06/24/2016 at 17:56 |
|
I’ve met one or two old-money types who much preferred Bentley for some reason. “You buy a Rolls to be driven, you buy a Bentley to drive!”
Granted, the guy who said that was driving a classic Bentley, not a modern one.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 19:04 |
|
Upper-Middle class people with taste
![]() 06/24/2016 at 19:17 |
|
Here in the UK. Company car fleet managers, as most other luxury sedans. Doesn’t change the fact that I’d love to own a current gen XJ. Incredible car.
![]() 06/24/2016 at 19:26 |
|
That’s some serious depreciation for the recent models as well.